top of page


This last Sunday, I attended the Cahaba Theatre Group’s staged reading of Neil Simon’s Jake’s Women. As there was only one performance, it makes little sense to review it in full, but it was an interesting afternoon at the theatre albeit in a decidedly nontheatrical venue. The reading was held at the Clubhouse on Highland, an early 20th century Arts & Crafts style home that is now used for charitable events, weddings, and other cultural activities.



It was a beautiful afternoon in this Fall that looks like Fall, but most decidedly does not feel like one as we have had record-breaking highs in Birmingham, Alabama. The venue itself was gorgeous, but like all spaces not intended for theatre, it has its issues. With the seating all one level, audience members bobbed their heads back and forth and up and down to witness certain moments of the piece, itself performed under much too dim lighting (especially on the day Daylight Savings Time ended). The “stage” was nothing more than chairs, stools, and lit music stands that the performers could step up to during certain moments of action. In a way, it was the perfect setup for Neil Simon’s play—a look at the life of a writer with a very vivid imagination.


The late Neil Simon came of age with a group of young writers who all got their big breaks writing for Sid Caesar’s Your Show of Shows. That writers’ room included Mel Brooks, Larry Gelbart (TV’s M*A*S*H), Woody Allen, Carl Reiner, and the (then) team of Danny and Neil Simon. Can you imagine such a room as this? Well, you can—because Simon immortalized it himself in the play Laughter on the 23rd Floor, which inspired a television film starring Nathan Lane. The Simon brothers then turned to Broadway with the play Come Blow Your Horn, but Danny was persuaded by other interests and the sole credit went to Neil, who had hist first modest hit. That was the beginning of one of the most successful playwriting careers in theatre history.


Simon’s prolific work can be divided into three periods: his early raucous comedies (Barefoot in the ParkThe Odd CouplePlaza Suite, and The Sunshine Boys), his maturation period that dealt with heavier issues through comedy (Chapter Two and the “Brighton Beach” trilogy—Brighton Beach MemoirsBiloxi Blues, and Broadway Bound), and a late period which featured his highest highs (the Pulitzer Prize-winning Lost in Yonkers) and his lowest lows (never reaching Broadway with his last dramedy, Rose’s Dilemma). 


Of his later works, my favorite (hands down) is Jake’s Women, though it took Simon longer than almost all his plays to get right. First workshopped at the Old Globe Theatre in San Diego in 1990 starring Peter Coyote, it finally reached sold out Broadway houses in 1992 with Alan Alda at the helm. Essentially, Jake’s Women is autobiographical in the sense that it delves into Simon’s creative life as a writer and his inability to devote himself to his craft and to the spouse du jour. Married five times, Simon’s wives often would be disappointed when he was clearly thinking about work while they wanted attention. Simon was acutely aware of this, and Jake’s Women is a reckoning with himself. 


In the play, the writer Jake conjures imaginary versions of the various women in his life to help him through his emotional problems, chiefly his floundering marriage with Maggie (Valerie Brock). The single male onstage, Jake has imagined conversations with his sister, therapist, his daughter at two different ages, a girlfriend (after he is separated from Maggie), and his first wife, who we find out died very young. This is, perhaps, the most autobiographical element as Simon’s first wife Joan Baim tragically died of cancer in her early forties. Her free spirit was the inspiration for Barefoot in the Park and, reading his two volumes of memoirs, it seems clear to me that Simon never got over her.


Jake’s Women is a different Simon play. Most of them, while they have the laugh-a-minute one liners for which he was famous, are grounded in naturalism. This is Simon attempting a kind of magical realism with the long-form imaginary conversations. Essentially, except for the few “actual” scenes, Jake is really talking to himself the entire play—his “women” are versions inside his head, and we have no idea how much they reflect their own “realities.”



Alan Alda was the perfect Jake. Thankfully, we have a 1996 television film that captures his performance. Jake is Jewish, neurotic, and articulate. While Alda was Italian and not Jewish, he blossomed in neurotic film roles—such as his performance in one of Woody Allen’s masterpieces, Crimes and Misdemeanors. In the film version, his conjurings could actually disappear while onstage, they simply enter and exit, or the transitions are done with lighting. Having a grounded, believable Jake (and an appropriately longsuffering Maggie) is the key to a soaring Jake’s Women.


Cahaba Theatre Group did not have that. Judd McCluney as Jake and Brock as Maggie served as almost fatal flaws for this incarnation. This Jake was whiny, unsympathetic, and clearly had not spent enough time with the text as all the rhythms of Simon’s humor were lost in stumble after stumble. While I understand it was a reading and the scripts were present onstage, you can’t place the blame there. There is a way to do a reading, concert or staged, where the lines can lift and soar. But it takes a deep knowledge of the text because, even with its prerequisite broad humor, the dialogue does not have the same rhythms of The Odd Couple or The Sunshine Boys, which are hard to mess up by any standard. While the actress playing Maggie was supposed to be Midwestern and out of place in New York, her accent (perhaps the actress’ own) was decidedly New York and her facial expressions almost nonexistent. There was virtually no way to connect with the leads on any level.


The price of admission did have a payoff, however. The other group of “Jake’s women” were more than game to take up the slack. I must especially point out Luciana Jeffers as Edith, Jake’s therapist. Nailing every line, making the part her own, she was the reason to see the show. Also, the young actresses playing Jake’s daughter (Marlena Elliot and Summer Guffey) showed real, promising talent. This should not be a surprise as Martha S. Summey, the director, was a noted theatre teacher of adolescents for many years.


But, aside from the leads (and the length given McCluney’s off-rhythms), the real offense to me as an audience member was the silver-haired man who asked to sit next to us on our row. It was as if he had bathed in pure garlic then brushed his teeth with the stuff for good measure. The olfactory senses are the most acute and it was difficult to concentrate on Jake’s Women when way too often, a fresh wave of garlic breath wafted over me, making me sick to my stomach.


I guess one learned two things: if you’re going to do Neil Simon, your lead must understand and know the play and if you go out in public, nix the garlic in your meal. Your fellow theatregoers will thank you.


Unfortunately, Simon lived to see his style of comedy die out. He was never much taken seriously in his heyday (even with Tony Awards to his credit). He was mostly seen as a hit-making machine who only burrowed under the surface. But many of his plays defy that description: The Prisoner of Second Avenue, Proposals, and even one of the flops, 45 Seconds from Broadway, showed a writer of immense talent who might not have been able to shake his Borscht Belt beginnings but plunged into darker territory than you might think. Even that old warhorse The Odd Couple begins with a suicidal man and Chapter Two may go down as Simon’s most penetrative play on divorce and starting over at a certain age.


Overall, it was his popularity that was his downfall. “Serious” dramatists are not meant to be popular with mass audiences in much the same way comedies have a hard time being taken seriously in Hollywood for the Best Picture Oscar. This is an elitist and criminal, but a fact of reality in showbusiness. Nevertheless, Jake’s Women is a very funny and ultimately moving play about action over thought, of living life instead of dreaming it up, of reckoning with our faults and being brave enough to overcome them. Damn fine playwright, Neil Simon—and a master craftsman. And, as a man of the theatre, I’m sure he never bathed in garlic before attending his own premieres.

 

Jake’s Women

by Neil Simon

 

Directed by Martha S. Summey

The Cahaba Theatre Group, Inc.

The Clubhouse on Highland

19 views0 comments

**½ out of ****


The mid-1970s to early-1980s were an interesting time in movie history for a variety of reasons. On the one hand, the era of director-driven, personal films was ending with Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now and Michael Cimino’s Heaven’s Gate nearly bankrupting the studios that financed them. On the other hand, the age of the blockbuster sprung on the world with Steven Spielberg’s Jaws and George Lucas’ Star Wars. On a third, somewhat dirtier hand, there were mainstream films featuring hardcore pornography.


The age of Emmanuelle and Behind the Green Door was indeed, unbelievably now, upon that era’s ticket-goers in select cinemas near them. The reason it seems hard to imagine today is, after the NC-17 rating promised death at the box office, you don’t see such things anymore. Overall, given the quality of such ventures, that’s probably a plus. While certain European films still navigate the world between serious films and porno (a recent-ish example being Blue is the Warmest Color), such movies are virtually unknown in America and have disappeared in the age of home viewing, beginning with direct-to-video and DVD and well into the streaming boom.


The most notorious of all such “high-class” porn films was dreamed up by Bob Guccione, founder of Penthouse magazine, who wanted in on the action after Hugh Hefner (of all people) invested the money to give us Roman Polanski’s chilling version of Macbeth. Guccione’s dreams were somewhat more elevated, however. He wanted to make a Roman epic that would show Ancient Rome as it truly was, unlike the Ben-Hurs of the world—not just the playful and orgiastic sex, but the sheer ubiquity of violence and bloodletting. His choice of subject was the emperor Caligula and the screenwriter he chose for the project was none other than the uncredited author of Ben-Hur himself, Gore Vidal.


Vidal was not a bad choice in the slightest. Through his novel series Narratives of Empire (in works such as BurrLincoln, and Hollywood), he chronicled the subject of power in America like no one had or has since. Born into a political family, he made a splash in his home country before moving to Ravello, Italy to watch the imperial American bloodletting from the other side of the Atlantic. While his fame was chiefly gained from his talk show appearances and snarky columns, he was a gifted writer of prose and gets little credit for his borne profession: as a real writer of and about power.


Guccione’s choice for director was slightly odder: an avant-garde filmmaker who had turned to Eurosex films, Tinto Brass (Salon Kitty). But more audaciously than hiring Vidal, he wanted unsimulated sex to be filmed in between dramatic scenes featuring the top talent of the acting world, including Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O’Toole, and John Gielgud. So, Guccione wanted to go big or go home, clearly.


The resulting production smacked of disaster from the get-go. Brass disliked Vidal’s two drafts and hired his own onset writers, Guccione fired Brass and so, a big budget, arthouse-porn film appeared with the credits “Principal Photography by Tinto Brass” and, most hilariously, “Based on an Original Screenplay by Gore Vidal.” The latter is possibly the funniest film title card of all time except a 1930s Hollywood production of Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream that included “Additional Dialogue by…”

Nevertheless, after censorship issues in many major countries, Guccione released his Caligula in 1979 to horrendous reviews, but huge ticket sales as few could stay away from what Mirren called later called “an irresistible mix of art and genitals.” The version that was finally released was completed by Guccione and Giancarlo Lui, who went back onto the sets and inserted the hardcore shots, much to the dismay of everyone involved. But the movie made money and, on videocassette, became a notorious cult classic.


In the early 1980s, Guccione released an R-rated version for wider distribution and, a few years ago, an “Imperial Edition” DVD gave us the Imperial Cut, which also ejected the pornographic content and was allegedly supposed to give us more of Brass’ original intentions. Recently, however, Caligula has been back in the news as a new edit premiered at the 2023 Cannes Film Festival. The Ultimate Cut is nearly three hours in length, was produced by Thomas Negovan (primarily a noted creator of art installations), and still manages to cut the same sex material as the other cuts mentioned. What sets it apart, however, is it uses a newly commissioned score, an animated title sequence, and (most impressively) not one single shot from the original film.


My Ultimate Cut DVD arrived recently and, for frames of reference, I watched the original and Imperial Cuts before plunging into Negovan’s work. I must admit, though I’ve owned the Imperial Edition for many years, I still hadn’t seen the original film all the way through. Mostly because I would fall asleep less than an hour in every time—not saying much for a “notorious” movie. This time, however, I took advantage of the Imperial Edition’s Special Features and read Vidal’s two drafts before watching the film. The Ultimate Cut is supposed to be more of Vidal’s intentions, and it largely is, though there are still significant differences in the last third of the new reconstruction.


So how can one film provide us with so many disparate versions and why? For one thing, McDowell’s performance has always been criticized in much the same way as Jack Nicholson’s in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining. In the original Stephen King novel, Jack Torrance gradually becomes a monster while many who watched Kubrick’s adaptation (a bad one, of bad source material—sorry) saw madness in Nicholson’s eyes from the first frame leading to the overwhelming critical and audience consensus that Nicholson’s performance does not build much.


With Caligula, Vidal wanted to portray him as a good person who went bad. Guccione and Brass wanted the madness from the beginning and both the original and Imperial Cuts suffer from this. Sadly, as early on as the scenes with Tiberius (O’Toole) and Nerva (Gielgud), McDowell’s Ultimate Cut performance does not escalate as much as we would have hoped. Overall, it might still be a better performance—McDowell certainly thinks so—but not appreciably.


Also, curiously for a project showing Vidal’s read on the character, one of the most interesting aspects of the original version—Caligula demanding Nerva say he was seeing Isis on his ascent to the inevitable is lost in the Ultimate Cut. This is, perhaps, the only change I missed, but most of what Vidal wanted as far as Caligula’s monotheism was never filmed for the movie in the first place, so Negovan can only deal with the footage he has—it’s 90 hours of footage (and he went through all of it), but some good material from Vidal is still lost to time.


Is this Caligula a better film than the one from 1979? Well, in the original and Ultimate cuts, one today can admire its ambition. Guccione’s idea, overall, was not a bad one: to show pagan Rome with realism. But, along with that, scenes of endless sex cut back and forth from ones of such extreme violence (downplayed a tad in the Ultimate version) makes it hard to keep one’s eyes glued to the screen. While the shot of Princess Julia Drusilla’s death is much more palatable in the newer version, there remains a lot of senseless violence filmed rather too naturalistically. In telling the story of Caligula, that is perhaps inevitable, but never satisfying on a movie-going level in any traditional way.

Overall, I admired Negovan’s work. You have to give it to someone who takes on a task such as this because the film does include great acting from some of the best actors who ever worked onscreen. Mirren’s role has tripled in size, but to be ever the contrarian, I disagree with the consensus that it is a better performance. With the role of Caesonia, there is only so much one can do. In the never-seen-before footage, Mirren is not especially dazzling (a crime, given her obvious ability).


In the end, we have a new cut of the film that is better, but not a masterpiece. Ambitious as it is, when you think about wanting to portray “the real Rome” and yet having see-through, plastic-looking bathtubs (no matter how gloriously rendered by Oscar-winner Danilo Donati), there are still laughable moments between what you can admire and what you can stomach


The DVD features two audio commentaries, one by Negovan with the new editor, Aaron Shaps, and another with Negovan and author Grant Morrison as well as the Teaser from Cannes. The Blu-Ray edition includes the original 1979 film as well.


PS—While the new score is fine, it is actually hard to watch Caligula without the original musical selections from Sergei Prokofiev and Aram Khachaturian. The former’s work, especially, is almost indelibly linked to the film.


Caligula: The Ultimate Cut

Blu-Ray/DVD, 2024

Drafthouse Films/Sunshine Mesa Films/Vitagraph Films

 

Thomas Negovan, reconstructionist/producer, Ultimate Cut

Tinto Brass, principal photographer

Gore Vidal, original screenwriter

Troy Sterling Niles, composer, Ultimate Cut

Aaron Shaps, editor, Ultimate Cut

Silvano Ippoliti, cinematographer

Danilo Donati, art director

Bob Guccione/Franco Rossellini, producers

 

Malcolm McDowell as Caligula

Helen Mirren as Caesonia

Teresa Ann Savoy as Drusilla

Peter O’Toole as Tiberius

John Steiner as Longinus

Lori Wagner, Agrippina

John Gielgud as Nerva

10 views0 comments
bottom of page